Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Emergency radiology ; : 1-11, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1728021

ABSTRACT

Background Admission chest CT is often included in COVID-19 patient management. Purpose To evaluate the inter- and intraobserver variability of the Covid Visual Assessment Scale (“Co.V.A.Sc.”) used for stratifying chest CT disease extent and to estimate its prospect to predict clinical outcomes. Materials and methods This single-center, retrospective observational cohort study included all RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 adult patients undergoing admission chest CT, between 01/03/2021 and 17/03/2021. CTs were independently evaluated by two radiologists according to the “Co.V.A.Sc.” (0: 0%, 1: 1–10%, 2: 11–25%, 3: 26–50%, 4: 51–75%, 5: > 75%). Patient demographics, laboratory, clinical, and hospitalization data were retrieved and analyzed in relation to the “Co.V.A.Sc.” evaluations. Results Overall, 273 patients (mean age 60.7 ± 14.8 years;50.9% male) were evaluated. Excellent inter- and intraobserver variability was noted between the two independent radiologists’ “Co.V.A.Sc.” evaluations. “Co.V.A.Sc.” classification (Exp(B) 0.391, 95%CI 0.212–0.719;p = 0.025) and patient age (Exp(B) 0.947, 95%CI 0.902–0.993;p = 0.25) were the only variables correlated with ICU admission, while age (Exp(B) 1.111, p = 0.0001), “Co.V.A.Sc.” (Exp(B) 2.408;p = 0.002), and male gender (Exp(B) 3.213;p = 0.028) were correlated with in-hospital mortality. Specifically, for each “Co.V.A.Sc.” unit increase, the probability of ICU admission increased by 1.47 times, and the probability of death increased by 11.1 times. According to ROC analysis, “Co.V.A.Sc.” could predict ICU admission and in-hospital death with an optimal cutoff value of unit 3 (sensitivity 56.0%, specificity 84.3%) and unit 4 (sensitivity 41.9%, specificity 93.6%), respectively. Conclusion “Co.V.A.Sc.” upon hospital admittance seems to predict ICU admission and in-hospital death and could aid in optimizing risk-stratification and patient management.

2.
Emerg Radiol ; 29(3): 479-489, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1729321

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Admission chest CT is often included in COVID-19 patient management. PURPOSE: To evaluate the inter- and intraobserver variability of the Covid Visual Assessment Scale ("Co.V.A.Sc.") used for stratifying chest CT disease extent and to estimate its prospect to predict clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center, retrospective observational cohort study included all RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 adult patients undergoing admission chest CT, between 01/03/2021 and 17/03/2021. CTs were independently evaluated by two radiologists according to the "Co.V.A.Sc." (0: 0%, 1: 1-10%, 2: 11-25%, 3: 26-50%, 4: 51-75%, 5: > 75%). Patient demographics, laboratory, clinical, and hospitalization data were retrieved and analyzed in relation to the "Co.V.A.Sc." RESULTS: Overall, 273 patients (mean age 60.7 ± 14.8 years; 50.9% male) were evaluated. Excellent inter- and intraobserver variability was noted between the two independent radiologists' "Co.V.A.Sc." EVALUATIONS: "Co.V.A.Sc." classification (Exp(B) 0.391, 95%CI 0.212-0.719; p = 0.025) and patient age (Exp(B) 0.947, 95%CI 0.902-0.993; p = 0.25) were the only variables correlated with ICU admission, while age (Exp(B) 1.111, p = 0.0001), "Co.V.A.Sc." (Exp(B) 2.408; p = 0.002), and male gender (Exp(B) 3.213; p = 0.028) were correlated with in-hospital mortality. Specifically, for each "Co.V.A.Sc." unit increase, the probability of ICU admission increased by 1.47 times, and the probability of death increased by 11.1 times. According to ROC analysis, "Co.V.A.Sc." could predict ICU admission and in-hospital death with an optimal cutoff value of unit 3 (sensitivity 56.0%, specificity 84.3%) and unit 4 (sensitivity 41.9%, specificity 93.6%), respectively. CONCLUSION: "Co.V.A.Sc." upon hospital admittance seems to predict ICU admission and in-hospital death and could aid in optimizing risk-stratification and patient management.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Aged , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
3.
World J Gastroenterol ; 27(25): 3780-3789, 2021 Jul 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1302602

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted hospital organization, with the necessity to quickly react to face the pandemic. The management of the oncological patient has been modified by necessity due to different allocation of nurses and doctors, requiring new strategies to guarantee the correct assistance to the patients. Hepatocellular carcinoma, considered as one of the most aggressive types of liver cancer, has also required a different management during this period in order to optimize the management of patients at risk for and with this cancer. The aim of this document is to review recommendations on hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance and management, including surgery, liver transplantation, interventional radiology, oncology, and radiotherapy. Publications and guidelines from the main scientific societies worldwide regarding the management of hepatocellular carcinoma during the COVID-19 pandemic were reviewed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL